The World is Watching President Obama
Jul 8th, 2009Take the action now! For God’s sake, we are the leaders of free world! How could we possibly even think about sitting around a table and negotiating with the members of this regime?
Take the action now! For God’s sake, we are the leaders of free world! How could we possibly even think about sitting around a table and negotiating with the members of this regime?
A democratically elected government must heed the will of the people, not its own personal agenda. Thus, when Iranians as a nation and a people elect a democratic government and choose their leaders, their will shall rule.
With Iran now fast approaching the nuclear threshold, an Administration that doesn’t want bullets to fly needs more than diplomacy. The only way Iran’s regime is going to stop its nuclear program is if it feels some pain it can believe in.
Iran now possesses 5,600 centrifuges in which it can enrich uranium — a 34-fold increase from 2006 — and plans to add 45,000 more over five years. That will give Tehran an ability to make atomic bombs on an industrial scale.
To chair the 2009 governing board of the U.N.’s flagship agency, the multibillion-dollar globe-girdling United Nations Development Program, dedicated to promoting good governance and ending poverty, the U.N. has now picked–wait for it–the Islamic Republic of Iran.
And yet the one place where Moslems are cynical about Iran is in Iran itself, where the regime relies on a narrow base of support amid a state that (despite its vast oil reserves) is in economic shambles. Thus, the supreme irony of the Middle East is that the place where anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism are least potent is in the Iranian heartland.
For a glimpse of this setup, you don’t have to wait for Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s annual rant on the U.N. General Assembly stage. All you have to do is stroll through the main visitors’ lobby of the landmark U.N. building in Manhattan. In that lobby, by far the most prominent display is a row of eight portraits, framed in gold, and showing the lineup of secretaries-general from the U.N.’s founding at the end of World War II, through the current Ban Ki-Moon
ازآنجا که فانی یزدی ممکن است در مقاله بعدی خود ادعا کند که کنفرانس دانشگاه نیویورک “درگیر مسائل روزمره سیاست ایران” نیست (و لابد از نماینده خانواده راکفلر و آبراهامیان و گری سیک و نماینده حکومت، برای گفتگو در مورد کشورداری در زمان ساسانیان دعوت کرده اند)، بهتر است در همینجا به دلائل برگزاری این جلسه نظری بیاندازیم.
In fact, it is obvious that this regime is never going to give up its ambitions in developing the nuclear power. So, why are we falling for its game and its song and dance and giving this regime ample time to complete its nuclear project? Why can’t we look back at the last three years of G5+1 negotiation with this regime? and what have we got to show for it, absolutely nothing.
The most compelling reasons Iran should not possess a nuclear weapon can be broadly grouped into four categories.